"I intend that my work makes beautiful the alternative heroisms of the antiwar veteran in the
Vietnam period."
~ Jane Irish, 2012
Last winter Special Collections undertook an interesting challenge. The La Salle Art Museum was planning to feature Philadelphia-based artist
Jane Irish in their gallery spaces. As is mentioned in our
blog post of last year, Jane Irish's relationship with La Salle University has spanned over a decade. She credits the Connelly Library's
Imaginative Representations of the Vietnam War Collection as a source of inspiration for her artwork, and has spent years working with John Baky, Curator of Special Collections and Director of Libraries, who built the Vietnam Collection from his
own unique vision. It was therefore appropriate for the Library to co-sponsor the exhibition and its programming. What culminated was ultimately a collaborative exhibition that was mounted in two locations on campus; one featuring the artist's work, and one exploring the artist's inspiration. Because of the artist's close ties to the Department of Special Collections, this exhibition was especially important to document. The challenge for us was
how to do so...
 |
| Special Exhibition Gallery, March 2012 |
For the
Jane Irish: War Is Not What You Think exhibition, the La Salle University Art Museum's Special Exhibition Gallery was wrapped with Irish's two large scroll-like compositions:
The Conversation (2010) and
La Conversation (2011). Most prominent in these ink wash on paper paintings is the presence of text, which floats like scattered pages in varied fonts across the 30 foot span of each work. The scrolls, composed in frames, show images of the Vietnamese landscape alongside images of American Veterans of the Vietnam War. The raw elements of these paintings exist in the form of 18th century Vietnamese poetry, poems by Vietnam veterans, images from documentary film and photographs, and the artist's own first-hand impression of the Vietnamese landscape from her travels. Carmen Vendelin, Curator of Art for the University Art Museum, explains these
"Points of Reference" in her piece for the exhibition's brochure. To enhance the experience of Irish's art, three media players played music and clips from selected works from the Library's Vietnam Collection. The opening reception for the exhibition was held on January 18, 2012, from 5 to 7 p.m in the Art Museum. Poets
W.D. Ehrhart and
John Balaban, whose works heavily influenced Irish's artwork, read poetry at the opening.
 |
| Vet Center Vase, by Jane Irish |
The 20th Century Gallery in the Art Museum featured a series of
landscape paintings that Jane Irish painted on site during two trips to Vietnam. Irish brought evocative poems with her on her travels and used each as part of her creative process, allowing the poems to inspire her work. Those poems were reproduced in the gallery space next to each painting. The Art Museum also featured two
ceramic works by Jane Irish, each of which featured poetry by Vietnam War Veterans.
 |
| Main banner in the Library Exhibition |
The exhibition in the Library came together through Jane Irish and John Baky's close partnership. The two pulled hundreds of videos from the Vietnam Collection-- seeking out specific examples of stereotypes and mythology that can be found in the artwork of the covers. They rooted out comic books, objects, posters, books of photography, dissertations, board games and journals. The exhibition came into form; a set of collages of material, images pulled from the Collection's shelves and arranged into leitmotifs and silk-screened onto
panels to be hung in the exhibit space. Each of the five cases in the
Library exhibit space were carefully arranged in such a way to attempt to capture and illustrate the artist's inspiration. In effect, the exhibition went beyond capturing the inspiration of the artist, and served as a vehicle to explore the research vision for the Vietnam Collection-- which aims to offer a myriad of interpretations of the experience of the Vietnam War. With its bright yellow and red banner at the front of the exhibit space, the exhibition seemed to immediately confront viewers with the question, "
What do you think war is?" It teased you by showing you pictures of Rambo (
is he how you picture a Vietnam War veteran?) and confronted those pictures with artwork drawn by actual veterans with severe post-traumatic stress disorder. The exhibition was "narrated" in a sense, by John Baky, who provided textual description for each of the cases that conveyed his in-depth knowledge of the artist's work and her sources of inspiration.
As it was, the dual exhibition served two purposes; first, to show the work of a nationally renowned artist; second, to show the genesis and evolution of her inspiration to create that work. The physical exhibitions were designed to immerse the viewer in a scene, often visually and aurally. The Library exhibit was intentionally abstract. There was no doubt that the Library would want to create a digital component, an online exhibit or webpage that would record and preserve the exhibition. However, this exhibition presented some challenges. First, were some issues with capturing scale. The works in the Art Museum's Special Exhibition Gallery were each 30 or more feet long. We wanted to capture the feeling of being in the space. There were multiple galleries used in the exhibition, and there were also a few special events with the artist that we wanted to record. In the Library there were other concerns related to scale and content. Each case was a collage of items, and it was important to capture those collages as a whole, but we also wanted to highlight each item. We had hundreds of items from the
Imaginative Representations of the Vietnam War Collection on view!
Compounding the issue of capturing a large and complex exhibition was a shift in our Library's collective thinking about digital exhibits. Special Collections was already in the midst of a major website redesign, and the goal of that project was to use a simple platform that didn't require back-end coding. The Library's digital collections were being migrated out of an outdated platform to
ContentDM. The Connelly Library had successfully mounted sophisticated web exhibits in the past, but there was a feeling that the process of building digital exhibits from scratch wasn't sustainable with our small staff. In short, we were looking for a simpler way to deliver all of our digital content, but we had complex content to deliver. Our new
Special Collections website would use the open source web publishing platform Omeka, which is has a plug-in designed for creating online exhibits. Our plan was to create the new website and to use the digital content of the Jane Irish exhibition to create an online exhibit in Omeka. We started working with Omeka for the website at the end of 2011, and the exhibition was mounted from January through March of 2012.
 |
| Exhibit Case 1 on display in the Connelly Library |
After
extensive customization, Omeka turned out to work well for the purpose of creating a website that would be easy to frequently edit and add fresh content to. But that process took much longer than was desired, and the "out of the box" design of the exhibit feature was clunky-- structured for a more traditional exhibit, such as one with a small set of pictures and associated text. We were looking at having to do
more customization, and that's when it started to feel like we were drifting back to the model of hand coding our online exhibits. The other frustration involved the actual digital content of the exhibition that we had collected. We had taken a number of digital photos of the exhibit spaces, both in the Art Museum and the Library. The cases in the Library were extremely difficult to photograph. They had been thoughtfully arranged under glass in rectangular cases, often relying on the structure of the case itself to support the design. Many of the materials on display had plastic reflective surfaces, and so photographing through glass cases under florescent library lighting made for some pretty terrible pictures (see above).
What followed was a somewhat prolonged period of reflection on the design of online library exhibits...
are they all really boring in design? If they aren't, were they made by a professional web designer? Does anyone read the text? Are the content of exhibits buried in a larger library websites being found online? Are these exhibits teaching anyone anything? Was the purpose to draw attention to the physical exhibit, or to somehow preserve it? We wanted to create a scholarly resource-- well organized, good metadata, useful for research.
How could we create something of good quality without a dedicated web designer on staff? And even if we had one, how would that person reinterpret the physical exhibition? How would the original design change?
Existential crisis aside, the physical exhibition had to be dismantled at the end of March. At this point we had a lot of pictures of the spaces and the individual works of art that had been on display in the Art Museum. In May we had a visit from the Director of Outreach and Scholarly Communications and an Outreach Associate from
Bepress. The Library had recently begun formal development of an institutional repository for La Salle using the Digital Commons software managed by Bepress. Their staff was enthusiastic about our Special Collections, and shared a lot of ideas about how we could display our material in Digital Commons. Their original focus was on a journal run that we have digitized, which was in line with what one thinks of in regard to scholarly publishing. But as the crisis of how to handle the digital exhibition loomed, we reached out to their staff for advice...
Hi Peter,
I wonder if I might be able to run something by you…
I’m presently in a position where we've deconstructed a physical exhibit and we want to somehow deliver/archive a virtual version of it. What we had was a basic five exhibit case layout with all kinds of material from Special Collections collaged together—along with a few descriptive exhibit tags and some very descriptive case signage. I have digital pictures of the cases and text from the exhibit. The pictures are (frankly) very boring —just shots of the glass cases. The actual collages inside, and their parts are really the interesting thing.
I've considered rebuilding the contents from the cases against a black background and then photographing each item. What I’d imagined was a kind of pop-up of an image of the item with a caption. It’s important to capture both the collage and the individual item, and I've really been struggling with how to do so.
Since we are looking to use Digital Commons, I started looking around at library sites that might have built something similar. I found this from Columbia College:
http://www.lib.colum.edu/archives/exhibits/caam_board01.php
I’m curious to know how this exhibit is displayed in the repository. If we built something like this, how would it work in our IR? Maybe this is too technical of a question, but since I’m in the position where I am hoping to get started on something, I’m hoping to somehow develop it with Digital Commons in mind.
Any advice?
This was a collaborative exhibit with the University Art Museum, so we also have to consider ways to incorporate images of the gallery space over there, and a video of a related special event. I’m completely flexible at this point in how to deliver all of this. It was a very important event for us, and I’m really concerned about bringing it all together online.
The response from the Outreach Associate and their Client Services contact was very positive, and they immediately sent us ideas for possible structures. The beauty of using Digital Commons was that they created a very easy to use interface for users to upload content, but all of the design happens on their end. The purpose of
La Salle's Institutional Repository is "
capturing and archiving the creative and scholarly work of the La Salle Community," and that was what we really wanted to do!
Feeling confident that the product of the remaining work would be well displayed in Digital Commons, next came the fun part. Since we had a record of the arrangement of the original cases, it was possible to reconstruct their contents in an environment more conducive to creating good quality images.
 |
| Rebuilding Exhibit Case 1 |
Each item was also photographed, and the descriptive information about each was managed in a spread sheet. The result was a new set of images, representing everything that had been displayed and recording the "original" arrangement. Upon entering the office of the Special Collections Librarian, where the cases had been painstakingly rebuilt for photographing, John Baky remarked that the whole thing was very "meta." Here we were, rebuilding an exhibit that was intended to rebuild the experience of the inspiration of an artist who is interested in challenging historical memory.
 |
| Case 1, rebuilt and photographed for the web |
We worked closely with Bepress to select the best structure for the various collection of images. Most are displayed in "image galleries", which have a built in slideshow feature that creates a shadow box around the image. The two main parts of the exhibition were divided into two "communities," which have the different parts of the exhibition divided into a hierarchy of "subcommunities." That way we were able to have a gallery of the images of the exhibit spaces, and of the features inside of them. The staff was always available to answer any questions that arose as we uploaded content.
It's our hope that researchers will enjoy exploring the
digital archive of the Jane Irish exhibition at La Salle University. This project raised some interesting questions for our Department, which in its mission intends to preserve and explicate our Special Collections. We're glad that the product of our work will be archived along with other work of the University, and by using this software we're able to track downloads and determine whether any of this material is being found by researchers. The project of creating a quality research tool out of the product of someone's artwork that was created out of her use of our collections for research was very meta indeed.